Information moves through FullView along a single controlled path, crossing an authenticated ingress, an access and control layer, the platform's shared business context, and finally an authorization boundary before it becomes an experience for a user.
Each layer of the platform owns a distinct class of concern. Select a layer to read what it protects, why it matters, and how it relates to how FullView is built.
Every read of a workspace's context passes through five stages. An unauthorized attempt does not travel further than the boundary that rejects it.
FullView connects to business systems for specific purposes. Each connection remains legible inside the platform: what is connected, why, what it contributes to context, and which module reads that context.
FullView's shared business context is what makes individual modules more useful. That shared understanding also makes explicit authorization boundaries between the context and each module particularly important.
One illustrative journey. A search-console impression enters the platform, joins the shared business context, and becomes a visible opportunity for a user. Each stage is a boundary.
FullView uses AI to make context useful — reading signals, drafting recommendations, and surfacing opportunities. Because AI is part of the platform's architecture, it operates within the same boundaries as every other component.
Every enforcement decision — scope, purpose, role — ultimately lives in code. The application is where those decisions are applied, and the infrastructure is what carries the application.
Security considerations begin during the design of a feature and continue through its operation. Each stage feeds the next.
Security documentation and assurance information will evolve alongside FullView. What is available today is listed as such; what is planned is listed as such.
FullView does not display security certifications it has not achieved, and does not display badges it has not been granted. As formal attestations are completed, they will appear on this page with links to the corresponding reports.
Security is treated as part of the architecture rather than a single perimeter. Identity, access, connections, data, the shared business context, application code, infrastructure, and monitoring each own a distinct class of concern. This page documents how those layers relate to each other.
Every connection is named, has a stated purpose, and is used only for that purpose. Modules read the resulting context — they do not read connected systems directly. Connections can be inspected and revoked.
The shared business context is what makes individual modules more useful, and it makes explicit authorization boundaries between the context and each module especially important. Modules do not automatically receive every piece of context — they receive what they are authorized to read.
AI participates in the architecture rather than sitting on top of it. Only authorized workspace context contributes to a task, outputs are surfaced to users with explanations, and human visibility is preserved. Specific AI-provider arrangements will be documented on this page as they are formally established.
The Privacy policy is the canonical destination for how personal and business information is handled. Read Privacy →
Reach the team through the FullView Contact page. A dedicated security reporting channel will be published on this page as it is formally established. Contact FullView →
FullView does not currently display security certifications it has not achieved. Formal attestations will be added to this page and to the Trust Center as they are completed, alongside links to the corresponding reports. Trust Center →
Yes — enterprise-level security discussions are welcome. Reach out through the Contact page and the FullView team will follow up. Contact FullView →